Who says Class is Dead?

John Bercow's Coat-of-ArmsThis is the new coat-of-arms for John Bercow, Speaker for the House of Commons.  Along with previous speakers dating back to Sir Thomas More in 1253, a new portrait which remains the property of the government, was also commissioned.  Criticism has been levelled at these purchases because of the state of the economy and concerns about public spending but also because of their content.

However, I wonder if there isn’t more than a hint of snobbery aligned with the comments because John Bercow is the son of a North London cab driver and instead of attending one of the major public schools, he went to a comprehensive, and latterly gained a First Class Honours Degree from the University of Essex.   As the Right Honourable John Bercow, MP, he has been Speaker of the House of Commons since June 2009.

Despite being called tacky and tasteless in certain circles, I like the broad representations of his coat-of-arms.  The ladder shows his rise from humble beginnings; the golden balls (or roundels) his link with professional tennis and the scimitars from the County of Essex where he was at University.  Then interspersing his motto are small pink triangles which represent his championing of LGBT rights (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender). The Flag of Equality is represented by the rainbow curls on either side and then of course is the motto itself:  All Are Equal.

Personally anyone who promotes the concept of equality gets my vote, and whilst I am aware that he has courted controversy over his years in politics his achievements have clearly been based on hard work and his own abilities.   Given that the role of Speaker is one of the cornerstones of our democracy with an ancient lineage, I think this merits both a portrait and a coat-of-arms.

What’s in a Name?

Well as someone who changed hers from a birth name meaning “puritanical self-punishment” to a given spiritual name meaning “eternal wisdom” (work in progress I always say!) quite a lot.   And so it would seem for the 285 girls in the Indian state of Maharashtra, who all changed their names from Nakusha meaning “unwanted” (because their parents wanted a boy) to one of their choice.  “Ashmita” which is Hindi for “very tough” was chosen by one young woman and no doubt she will need to be as she grows up in an environment where women are frequently considered a burden rather than an asset.  However, it’s a positive step and whilst I don’t consider myself a feminist I do champion equality, so may there be many more along the path of freedom for oppressed women everywhere.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-15414796

Battening down the Hatches

As I was driving home I was listening to a news item on BBC Radio4 which was outlining how many of the thirty-something generation in China, who have moved from the villages to the cities to work in the factories that churn out huge amounts of products to the West, are now becoming quite vocal about receiving a better wage for their work.  It seems that they are not prepared to “shut up and put up” like their long suffering parents before them, and in my book, quite right too.

What was particularly interesting were the closing comments of the report which essentially said that if they won their fight for fairer pay, then we in the West would no doubt end up paying more for all those products we buy that are “Made in China.”  Well personally since there are so many in the marketplace, I would at least feel happier knowing that the people making them were receiving something akin to appropriate payment rather than slogging away for a pittance.

Unfortunately though I’m sure there would be many who wouldn’t share that view because recession seems to bring out the mentality of “everyone for themselves”, just when it would perhaps be healthier if we all looked at ways to be more cohesive as a collective.  If our buying things on-the-cheap means the suffering of someone else, then I believe that ultimately we are all impoverished, not necessarily financially but in spirit.